The Differences and Similarities

assalamualaikum. wr.wb. well, hello guys! today i want to inform you about the differences and similarities about two journals that i've been share to you before. so, lets check this out!

title : "USE OF MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING:
A STUDY"
author's name : Simhachalam Thamarana
introduction : this journal discusses the use of multimedia technologies in english language learning.  The author wants to know how effective the use of multimedia technology is in the learning process for students.
literature review : it is more important to understand how to use this technology more effectively and efficiently to be able to issue and issue new ideas in producing and presenting learning materials that enable students to be motivated to explore the content of learning and further enrich the learning process.
methodology : The issues of poor and ineffective learning of English language had been noticed among
undergraduate students in the collages of all the three north-costal districts in Andhra Pradesh,
i.e. Visakhapatnam, Vizianagaram and Srikakulam. At present, there are many Multimedia
technologies such as Internet, YouTube, Instant Relay Messenger, Smart Phone, Projector, Television, E-books, Graphics, Mp3 Player, Video player and Animations. These technologies have been contributing enormous to teaching and learning of English language effectively. Especially, Multimedia technologies are great source for language activities, material in teaching and learning English language. However, many students may not have the technical skills to make full use of these technological resources. Therefore, this study investigates the learners‟ attitudes towards the use of Multimedia technology

title : "Improving reading skills through effective reading strategies"
author's name : Hulya Kucukoglu
introduction : This journal discusses the Improving reading skills through effective reading strategies.  The author conducted research on effective reading strategies so that students were able to increase their reading skills.
literature review :  The idea here is that when we read something, the purpose is to try to
understand what the intention is. When dealing with reading, we encounter two layers of
reality: one that we can see and one that we cannot see. Therefore, the purpose of reading is to
make the invisible layer, the underlying meaning, visible and clear ). Teele asserts that
the goal of all readers should be to understand what they read (2004, p. 92). Research shows good
readers are actively involved with the text, and they are aware of the processes they use to
understand what they read. Teachers can help improve student comprehension through instruction
of reading strategies. Predicting, making connections, visualizing, inferring, questioning, and
summarizing are strategies shown by research to improve reading comprehension (Block & Israel,
2005). It is important to teach the strategies by naming the strategy and how it should be used,
modelling through the think-aloud process, group practice, partner practice, and independent use of
the strategy (Duke & Pearson, 2005).
methodology :The purpose of this research project is to determine the level of awareness of reading students
 and improve their reading strategies.  Teacher researchers use six strategies;  predict, make
 connection, visualize, conclude, question, and summarize.  Strategy introduced to
students
 learning,
  showed that 9 out of 14 students did not know the strategy.

so i think its enough from me, thank you for reading💜